Indeed, prices aren’t likely going to rise for a while. But this might not necessarily mean the housing market isn’t on the mend. Perhaps we’re looking at the recovery all wrong, says Paul Dales at Capital Economics. In a report to clients recently, the economist said higher prices won’t be the sign that tells us there’s a real recovery under way. Rather, the recent pick-up in sales is what we should pay attention to.

After all, prices tend to be a lagging indicator. It could take six months for any improvements to show in the market, if not longer.

“Even if the asking price is at the right level when the home is first listed, it may still take a few months to find a buyer and another month or so before the contract is closed,” Dales wrote to clients last week. “The selling price that is registered at the end of this process therefore relates to the market conditions somewhat earlier.”

Sales have risen recently, reaching a few milestones.

In 2011, existing home sales climbed to 4.26 million – higher than the 4.19 million sales in 2010. Needless to say, this is far below the market’s peak of 7.1 million sales amid the housing boom in 2005. But it’s worth noting that for the past two years, sales have crept up from the market’s low of 4.1 million sales when the market collapsed in 2008. In particular, in the past six months, total homes sales have risen by 13% as borrowing costs for home mortgages continue to fall to record lows and investors making up the bulk of sales find opportunities in heavily discounted properties after foreclosures and short sales.

And a series of home sales data released later this week is expected to show that home purchases probably climbed in February to their highest level in nearly two years, according to forecasts in a Bloomberg survey. Sales of new and previously-owned properties combined are expected to rise to an annual rate of 4.93 million – the strongest since May 2010, and up from 4.89 million in January.

The evidence reminds us that perhaps we should change our expectations of what a housing recovery might look like, particularly following a crisis marked by record foreclosures and a financial crisis that sent the economy into one of the deepest recessions. The recovery we have been anticipating is defined more on the rate at which the glut of vacant properties comes off the market as opposed to any steady rise in prices, which some think won’t happen for another few years.

The inventory of unsold homes has dwindled, falling in January to 6.1 month’s worth of supply – its lowest level since March 2005. A supply of six months is generally considered ideal for a healthy housing market, but there continue to be several headwinds at play that could weigh down prices.

The most immediate threat is the $25 billion settlement that federal and state officials recently reached with five banks to end investigations into abusive foreclosures practices. The agreement, which had stalled pending foreclosures nationwide for more than a year, will probably add more properties into the market. Dales at Capital Economics estimates additional 3 million homeowners might succumb to foreclosure over the next few years.

And then there’s the longer-term threat to prices, which some experts say could arise when the Federal Reserve raises interest rates later. The inevitable move could potentially make the cost of home purchases more expensive relative to stagnant incomes.

So if anyone is looking at prices for signs of a recovery, it’s likely that they’ll miss it.