Europe’s relative lack of competitiveness on the technology front is no secret, but new research from the McKinsey Global Institute, published this morning, demonstrates how serious the problem is for corporate Europe and for the continent as a whole.

MGI found that Europe’s large firms have on aggregate been growing 40% more slowly than their U.S. counterparts, while investing 40% less in research and development. As a result, they’re around 20% less profitable, in terms of return on invested capital. The differences are “not sustainable in the long run,” MGI partner Jan Mischke told me this morning.

Europe is leading on cleantech innovation and the production of next-generation materials, but otherwise it’s lagging on technologies that cut through a variety of sectors, such as distributed computing and applied A.I., MGI warned. And that, the researchers claim, will end up threatening European strongholds like the automotive and luxury-goods sectors.

So, how to fix this? According to Mischke and his colleagues, Europe needs to treat the situation—in which it risks losing out on €2 trillion to €4 trillion in annual value by 2040—like the crisis that it is, comparable in some ways to the challenges Europe faced with the financial crisis, COVID, and now Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

“Now all eyes are obviously on the energy crisis,” he said. “Technology is as critical for the economy and quality of life in many ways as energy is…We are in a slow-motion crisis here, so let’s respond with the same speed and boldness.”

Some of the think tank’s recommendations for EU policymakers boil down to accelerating the sort of more-Europe initiative that is already the European Commission’s bread and butter—create real single markets for energy and finance; build a common European electronic ID system. MGI also recommends removing barriers to cross-border consolidation and harmonizing public procurement.

“At a European level, you will immediately trigger a significant consolidation wave of European firms while at the same time raising competition, Europe-wide and globally, rather than in each of the 27 member states,” said Mischke, who also urged a debate around limiting international takeovers in certain areas, “to allow nascent firms in Europe to grow towards the scale at which they can compete globally.”

That’s all about creating an “enabling environment” for European companies, Mischke said. But on the other hand, the onus is also on those companies themselves to step up.

“This is also a call out on nonexecutive boards and executive boards to think bolder and take more risks,” he said, calling for more strategic thinking around M&A, for example. “As long as this period of disruption and innovation lasts, scale and speed matter more than in more stable times. This is a time when you really need to be fast, large and bold, and that is exactly where Europe is at a disadvantage with its fragmentation and relatively slow decision-making machine.”

More news below.

David Meyer
@superglaze
david.meyer@fortune.com

TOP NEWS

Fed rates

The markets have been pricing in a particularly aggressive Federal Reserve interest rate hike of 50 basis points today. However, chances are that this won’t be a once-in-a-generation move, as the Fed could stay hawkish well into next year. Fortune

Russia sanctions

The European Commission has proposed a full ban on Russian crude oil within six months, and on refined products by the end of this year. The two countries that have been resisting the move owing to their reliance on Russian oil, namely Hungary and Slovakia, would get an extra year to comply. On top of that, the EU executive wants to see Russia’s largest bank, Sberbank, cut off from the SWIFT international payments system. Financial Times

Twitter IPO

Elon Musk reportedly wants to take Twitter private so he can hold an IPO as little as three years later. Wall Street Journal

Freedom isn’t free

Musk’s free-speech-first Twitter may not remain free for businesses and governments, the tycoon hinted in (obviously) a tweet. Guess that’s one way in which he can make good on his intention to make Twitter more profitable—though not by much, as he talked only about a “slight cost.” Meanwhile, a U.K. parliamentary committee has invited Musk for a chat about the misinformation and civil-liberties aspects of the takeover. Fortune

AROUND THE WATERCOOLER

Mobility data

Mobile phones’ broadcasting of their locations may be a surveillance nightmare for many people, but it became a useful public health tool in the pandemic, and now it’s making it much easier for aid agencies and others to track the Ukraine refugee crisis. Fortune

Tech bets

Wall Street’s generally bearish on tech at the moment, but Goldman Sachs money managers see a discount shopping opportunity. Here’s Fortune’s Anne Sraders on some controversial opportunities, including Chinese tech, semiconductors, and high-growth software-as-a-service companies—plus some areas to avoid. Fortune

Roe v. Wade

As much of the U.S. reacts in shock to the news that the Supreme Court is probably about to scupper federal abortion rights, Fortune’s Tristan Bove examined how the decision could upend many businesses: “The changes in abortion laws could…see employees begin asking for relocations, which businesses will have to react to. Even though any ruling is still months away, some companies are already promising employees that they will adjust their policies to compensate for these changes in people’s lives.” Fortune

Same salary

Madeline Pendleton, proprietor of an L.A.-based online boutique called Tunnel Vision, pays her employees the same salary as she herself takes. Here’s why. Fortune

This edition of CEO Daily was edited by David Meyer.