On Thursday, the Wall Street Journal tried its own crackdown and told workers to return beginning Nov. 1 for at least three days a week, up from a previous mandate of two days weekly. Meanwhile, senior editors and managers are expected to be back in the office full-time. 

In an email to staff, Matt Murray, the Journal’s editor in chief, wrote that “there’s little doubt that we do our best work, produce our best products, and grow, share and learn the most, when we are physically together.” 

He added that remote work makes many things harder.

But the union representing Wall Street Journal staff isn’t convinced. Tim Martell, executive director of the Independent Association of Publishers’ Employees, told Fortune that he doesn’t believe that being in the office is as important to the publication’s success as the Journal’s management says.

“We’re just not convinced, by the claims of Dow Jones management or the Wall Street Journal management, that there’s a need for an in-office newsroom, three days or five days per week, in order for the Wall Street Journal to be successful,” he said. “This company has been very, very successful for the past two-plus years.” 

As part of a recently negotiated contract between Dow Jones and the union, any departmental changes like requiring in-office work, must be announced 45 days in advance. That gives union members time to voice any concerns to union leaders.

And they’ve done just that. 

As of Friday afternoon, Martell said 30 to 40 employees had contacted the union about the latest return-to-the-office order. Of those, he said, 80% said they were opposed to any additional in-office work requirements, though he’d like to hear from more to get a more representative sample. 

Among the more common employee concerns, Martell said, were that working parents will be forced to make childcare arrangements; health and safety given that COVID is still a threat; and the belief that people are more productive at home without the noise of a newsroom. 

“I’m not impacted by this personally,” he said. “But I very much understand and feel the concerns that are being expressed by our members and frankly, that is what’s more important to me.”

The Wall Street Journal did not respond to Fortune’s request for comment. 

As for the New York Times, some of the staff, in addition to being frustrated by having to return to the office on a more regular basis, have asked for raises to combat inflation. 

The union representing the Wall Street Journal’s staff already has a one-year contract in place. Therefore, Wall Street Journal employees can’t refuse to return to the office, according to Martell.

“But I’ll say this, it’s only a one-year deal,” Martell said. 

The union reached a quick agreement with Dow Jones because the company did not want any distractions from contract negotiations, according to Martell. So the latest change to in-office policy might spill into future negotiations.

“If they are signaling to us that the future of work is going to look like work in the past,” he said, “I would bet that negotiations are going to be very difficult for a new contract next year.”

During contract negotiations, Martell said the company told the union repeatedly that it had been more successful than it has been in years, despite employees working remotely. 

“If coming back to work just for the sake of being back to work is the plan here, then that’s going to be hard to swallow,” he said.