Indeed, a hawkish Powell even used the dreaded r-word (“raise”)—having suggested he is responsive enough to calls to “look through” tariff-induced inflation by not increasing interest rates, a notion which likely would have sent the Oval Office into a fury.

While rates held steady at 4.25% to 4.5%, a split among the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is growing, with two members dissenting. This represents the highest level of friction within the FOMC for more than 30 years.

But despite the pressure—both from within the Fed and externally—Powell struck a cautious tone on cutting. For some time analysts have pencilled in a cut in September, the next meeting of the FOMC.

“Higher tariffs have begun to show through more clearly to prices of some goods, but their overall effects on economic activity and inflation remain to be seen,” Powell told reporters in a news conference following the meeting. “A reasonable base case is that the effects on inflation could be short-lived—reflecting a one-time shift in the price level. But it is also possible that the inflationary effects could instead be more persistent, and that is a risk to be assessed and managed.”

To the point of a one-time price shift, Powell said the FOMC is heeding advice to not letting tariff-related inflation cloud the picture of the fundamentals of the economy.

But while investors had used this argument to lobby for a cut, Powell said the fact he is holding rate steady is evidence of this pragmatism, saying the FOMC is “a bit looking through goods inflation by not raising rates.”

Tabling a rate rise is quite the opposite of what many investors and economists are hoping for, but Powell doubled down: “The economy is not performing as though restrictive policy were holding it back inappropriately.” Investors, therefore, have been left wondering what it will take for the FOMC to cut.

“Fed Chair Powell was much more hawkish than we were expecting at his press conference,” Bank of America’s macroeconomics team wrote in a note seen by Fortune. “He was asked several questions on what it would take for the Fed to cut in September. In response, Powell made it clear that the onus is on the data to justify a September cut.“

They added: “To be clear, hikes are still very unlikely, but Powell argued that the ‘efficient’ way of balancing risks to the dual mandate is to stay on hold because cutting too early introduces the risk of having to raise rates again later.”

Markets were minded to agree with BofA on its take of a hawkish Powell. Equity markets fell following the announcement while treasury yields rose.

Elsewhere, UBS’s Paul Donovan said markets may be seeing through the FOMC dissenters, explaining in a note this morning: “Fed Chair Powell tried to present the two dissenting views as being rationally based, but investors are bound to suspect that the rationale amounted to little more than an excited jumping up and down and shouting ‘pick me, pick me’ in the general direction of the White House. The press conference gave a slightly hawkish tone in anticipating the trade tax inflation yet to come.”

Holding on for September

Despite Powell’s speech eroding some of the confidence in a September cut, analysts are tending to hold on to the hope that a cut will come at the next meeting the month after next.

The Fed chairman gave them some reason to hope, for example saying: “We are also attentive to risks on the employment side of our mandate.”

“The expectation for this meeting wasn’t a rate cut, and I don’t think there would have been much upside to Powell signaling that one was imminent,” wrote Elyse Ausenbaugh, Head of Investment Strategy at J.P. Morgan Wealth Managemen, adding: “The data, as it stands today, isn’t yet calling for one, and a lot could change between now and the FOMC’s next decision point in September.”

Likewise, Goldman Sachs’s chief U.S. economist David Mericle wrote in a note to clients seen by Fortune: “Neither [Powell’s] statement nor the press conference provided any direct hints about the likelihood of a cut in September. In response to a question about the two-cut baseline in the June dots, Powell acknowledged but declined to endorse it, saying that he would not want to substitute his own judgment for the views of other participants, especially with two more rounds of employment and inflation data still to come before the September meeting.”

That being said, Goldman continues to forecast three cuts in 2025: In September, October and December, followed by two more in 2026 to bring the rate down to 3% to 3.25%.

Mericle added: “Powell’s comments today suggest to us that a September cut is certainly still up for debate but not that labor market softening over the next two months is necessarily required, and we continue to see multiple paths to a cut.”

UBS’s global wealth management chief investment officer, Mark Haefele, is minded to agree with a September rate cut—citing the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS)revealing declines in both openings and hires, as well as a lower quits rate. 

The Conference Board’s consumer confidence survey also noted 18.9% of respondents felt jobs were hard to get in July, suggesting the alarms for labor market weakening may be beginning to chime.

Haefele wrote: “We continue to expect Fed to resume policy easing in September, cutting rates by 100 basis points over the next 12 months. Investors should consider medium-duration high grade and investment grade bonds for more durable portfolio income.”