We define who we are not in times of ease—but in moments of fear. Today, fear is everywhere: in politics, in the markets, and in our planet’s future. However, uncertainty is also a call to lead with clarity, with intention, and with a long view. These are the moments that test legitimacy and define our legacy. When fear tempts us to retreat from what we know is right, it is precisely then that we must ask: What does the evidence tell us, and what kind of world do we want to create?
In today’s polarized environment, where diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risk analysis are under political attack, it’s easy to get swept up in the noise. Organizations like Adasina Social Capital, American Pride Rises Network and countless other values-aligned investors and entities have been outspoken advocates of DEI and ESG investing long before these attacks started. Our steadfastness has always been grounded in prudent investing and social justice values. Beneath the political noise, DEI and ESG are value-driven principles that improve outcomes across the board. From performance to customer loyalty, they reflect smart business tactics. They are strategic investing essentials, deeply tied to financial performance and risk management.
Institutional investors agree: 87% still believe ESG factors—including DEI considerations—are indicators of financial risk, not ideological positions. In an environment charged with fear and polarization, some may retreat from these proven frameworks in search of perceived safety. But like anyone in a volatile marketplace understands, smart money demands we stay the course. Integrating environmental risks, social dynamics, and governance structures leads to savvier decisions and stronger portfolios. It’s not political—it’s prudent.
DEI drives measurable performance
Companies leading the pack in diversity outperform those at the bottom by a remarkable 36% in profitability. The gains extend even further, showing that diverse organizations see 19% higher revenues from innovation. Most compelling of all, highly diverse teams make better decisions up to 87% of the time.
These aren’t just feel-good stats—they’re flashing signals to investors: ignore DEI, and you’re leaving performance on the table.
The cost of retreat
Since rolling back its DEI programs, Target has seen 5 million fewer shopping trips among customers, with CEO Brian Cornell confirming that sales fell because of “the reaction to the updates we shared on [DEI] in January” as a key factor driving the decline. Meanwhile, Costco saw nearly 7.7 million more visits since doubling down on its commitment to DEI.
The impact extends beyond consumer behavior. In a recent survey of 750 U.S. business leaders, 2 in 3 say their company suffered consequences after cutting DEI programs, including diminished employee morale and difficulty hiring top talent. The workforce impact is stark: 82% of employees said pulling back on DEI made them less engaged, and 62% of job seekers say they’d turn down offers from companies that don’t stand for diversity. These consequences represent material risks to business performance that prudent investors must consider when evaluating potential investments.
Recognizing these market realities, 1 in 3 business leaders in the above study say DEI is being reinstated. 75% admitted that whether or not their company has a DEI program ultimately comes down to what’s best for the bottom line, an admission that signals that business fundamentals, not political positioning, are still driving long-term decision-making.
ESG strengthens investment resilience
The politicization of ESG has created similar challenges, but the fundamental investment logic remains sound. Global insured losses from natural disasters reached $140 billion in 2024, the third most expensive year on record, forcing insurers to integrate climate risk data into pricing and underwriting decisions. To tell investors not to consider ESG factors forces them to intentionally ignore relevant information about a company, and investors simply won’t accept such constraints when performance and profitability demand comprehensive analysis. Smart investors know the truth: environmental risks hit supply chains, social issues affect talent retention, and governance impacts decision-making. These aren’t buzzwords—they’re business fundamentals. More than 75% of S&P 500 companies still tie executive compensation to ESG metrics, recognizing these factors as core business considerations. Market evidence continues to support this approach, as companies with strong ESG profiles show more resilient stock performance during market turbulence.
Shareholder support remains strong
Recent shareholder voting patterns offer the clearest proof that investors remain committed to DEI and ESG risk analysis. In 2025, every single anti-DEI shareholder proposal—across 32 major companies—has failed and they’re consistently rejected by margins of 97-100%. Major companies across the political spectrum, including Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Walmart, and Goldman Sachs, have all seen overwhelming shareholder support for maintaining DEI initiatives. Remarkably, company management largely recommended voting against anti-DEI proposals as well, demonstrating robust alignment between corporate leadership and shareholders.
This universal failure rate across these major corporations reveals that institutional investors view diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives as business necessities, not political positions. . Market demand for ESG data has resulted in Bloomberg, MSCI, and S&P Global all increasing their ESG-related research and analytics products in 2024-2025, responding to institutional investor demand for comprehensive risk assessment tools.
The confident path forward
The current political environment has shifted the conversation around DEI and ESG, but wise organizations know nothing real has changed the underlying financial logic that drives smart investing. While others retreat, those who recognize DEI and ESG considerations as essential investing tools—not political statements—may find themselves uniquely positioned for what’s ahead. The market doesn’t follow rhetoric. It follows returns.
In moments of fear, we’re tested. But what will last is how we chose to act when it mattered.
History will remember that the smart money wasn’t afraid—it was bold and invested with clarity, courage, and conviction.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.
