Family-business instincts are invaluable — until they become limiting. They teach resilience, loyalty, pragmatism, and financial discipline. But they do not necessarily teach you how to scale leadership beyond yourself, build for global markets, or invest aggressively ahead of returns. This is further amplified in Switzerland, where there is a cultural bias to stay humble and focus on what’s realistic. These are clear strengths. Yet global technology markets often reward – and require – a different posture: global ambition, rapid growth and the willingness to invest ahead of certain returns.
I grew up in Switzerland surrounded by entrepreneurs: my grandfather in construction, my father in surveying, my uncles in packaging and construction. That heritage came with a distinctly Swiss mindset to stay humble, build practical solutions, and prove yourself locally before daring to look abroad. Those lessons shaped Scandit in our early days to bootstrap, experiment, and find initial product-market fit.
But as Scandit grew, I realized that what had made us strong could also hold us back. To grow globally, I had to unlearn some of the traits essential in a small-to-medium family business – the instinct to improvise and solve problems yourself, to treat cash flow as the key measure of financial health, and to nurture a local community of stakeholders. Global growth required the ability to scale an organization, to invest ahead of revenue, and reach a global community you hadn’t yet met.
What I’ve come to learn is that if you’re leading a company beyond traditional business models ( that is, offering tangible products or in-person services that customers can directly experience), the mindset that can make a small-to-medium business entrepreneur successful can eventually hold you back. Not because that mindset is wrong, but because it’s optimized for a world without venture-style economics.
With that in mind, here are are four skills that I had to unlearn to scale our business to where we are today – with seven global offices and more than 2,100 customers, including seven of the top 10 retailers worldwide
Resilience and improvisation: From superpower to bottleneck
Growing up in a family of SMB entrepreneurs, problem-solving wasn’t a task you clocked into. It was simply how life worked. At dinner, you’d talk through challenges and solutions. On weekends, you’d troubleshoot whatever popped up. As a result, you don’t perceive challenges as interruptions – you see challenges as puzzles. You learn to stay calm, work with imperfect information, and keep moving.
As our company scaled, though, I quickly realized I couldn’t be the main person improvising and solving problems. In order to grow, you need to build a scalable organization, bringing in people you trust, giving them real ownership, and letting them solve problems autonomously. My role shifted from solving problems myself to building an organization where great problem-solving can happen without me.
There was also something unexpected in that shift. Once we had kids, I was able to protect evenings for dinner and put my kids to bed most nights. And once the house is quiet, I’ll sometimes go back to work – something I recognize from childhood: sitting nearby while my father worked through a tough issue late into the night. The difference now is I’m choosing where my attention matters most, and I’m building a team I can rely on for the rest.
What I’ve learned is that resilience helps you survive uncertainty. But it can also disguise organizational inefficiency. Growth requires organization and systems, not just resilience. If your team’s success still depends on your ability to improvise, you’re scaling effort, not impact.
The Cash-Flow Prison: When discipline becomes an anchor
Growing up, I absorbed a deep respect for building businesses on what you have, not on what you may have someday. My family’s companies were mainly built on cash flow – growing by delivering value, collecting payment and investing back into the business. This instilled in me a strong sense of responsibility that every investment should be rooted in results, and progress should be tangible.
That mindset served me well when starting Scandit. Coming straight from academia, my co‑founders and I bootstrapped the business during the early years. We ran lean, funded ourselves through early customers and competitive grants, and thought twice before spending extra. We’d share hotel rooms on business trips because it felt sensible.
But at some point, that instinct became an anchor. You raise capital, and the ground shifts – scaling requires deploying capital ahead of returns, not after. Learning to spend significant amounts of money proactively to unlock future growth was one of the essential mindset shifts in taking Scandit from a promising deep tech startup to a global company.
With early investments and subsequent Series B, C, and D rounds that brought our total funding to $273 million, we were suddenly operating at a scale my family’s businesses never had to contemplate. Investment was strategy – a key obligation to deliver on the business plan that would rationalize our valuation. In the earlier days, spending ahead of revenue sometimes still felt like malpractice: spending $20,000 on a marketing campaign could feel reckless. It felt even more risky not to spend.
What I’ve learned is that maturity in business means learning the difference between an expense and an investment. Both draw cash, but only one compounds. In the early days, I had to train myself to think beyond the monthly P&L, and remember that some costs buy future advantage – not necessarily an immediate return.
This shift isn’t about abandoning discipline but refining it. The same scrutiny that once questioned every line item needs to evaluate whether spending is protecting equity or creating it. What’s frugal at $10 million can become shortsighted at $100 million. As scale changes, so do the levers that create real value.
From Local Community Thinking to Global Stakeholder Strategy
In a traditional business, your local community is often everything. Your customers might live next door. Your suppliers know your kids. Success feels local, personal, reciprocal. Your company and your community rise together.
Scaling globally breaks that intimacy. When your reach becomes global, that local community instinct can start to fracture your focus. You can’t personally connect with everyone.
At scale, you need to be clear about who truly matters to your mission: your highest-impact customers, your top partners and internal stakeholders. When your business broadens beyond the familiar faces and places where trust was once built naturally, that systematic clarity becomes your new compass. You can’t nurture every relationship in the same way. But you can design for consistency in how you – and your team – listen, learn and deliver value.
What I’ve learned is that the challenge of scale isn’t losing connection – it’s institutionalizing it. You shift from personal proximity to establishing deliberate systems and processes that help you and your teams stay close to key customer needs, reinforce credibility, and ensure the organization continues to earn and expand trust at every level.
In doing so, you protect the intimacy that built your company in the first place, while creating the foundation to grow it far beyond where it began. The leaders who struggle most in this transition keep trying to replicate the intimacy of a small circle at global scale. That’s not loyalty – it’s exhaustion disguised as purpose.
The Skill of Strategic Unlearning
Many traditional family businesses are built around cashflow, not scale. This creates a ceiling to the size and reach of the businesses and the speed in which they scale resulting in a stronger need for the business owner to remain at the centre. These factors reduce the applicability and appeal to venture-style funding.
Scaling Scandit required unlearning some of the specific instincts that helped make my family’s businesses successful. It’s not about abandoning what shaped you — it’s about re‑evaluating its applicability and purpose in your current context. The same logic applies to the influence of AI we see today and how that is evolving the way businesses, teams and roles operate.
When you remove the constraints of operating like a traditional family business, or re-imagining how your business may operate in an AI-led era, you need to regularly ask: “What instinct or habit served us before that no longer serves us now?” That question keeps the organization elastic—building mechanisms for reflection, outside perspectives, and empowering people who think differently from the founding team.
What I’ve learned is that the process of unlearning, when institutionalized, keeps a growing company from becoming a prisoner of its past success and norms. Just as you design systems for hiring or forecasting, you must design one for unlearning. Because the hardest step in a company’s evolution isn’t learning something new but deciding what to stop or reimagine.
That is, ultimately, the real challenge of leading a company through a growth journey. The most expensive mistake isn’t necessarily doing the wrong thing. Sometimes it might be doing the right thing for too long.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.
