The Mozilla Foundation is best known for steering the open-source Mozilla project, which makes the Firefox browser and other apps, but last month it set up a research division called Open Source Research & Investigations. The division’s first task is to investigate the influence of online platforms on elections in the Global South. And although it’s also looking at YouTube, TikTok is its first big focus.

“The primary experience on the internet right now for many people is being influenced by TikTok in one way or another,” OSRI senior researcher Odanga Madung told me last week. “A huge chunk of the video people are watching now is coming from TikTok. Even if they’re not watching it on the platform, they’re watching it on WhatsApp or Instagram Stories.” Between that virality and attempts to ape the Chinese app—Facebook Reels and YouTube Shorts come to mind—Madung said we’re looking at the “Tiktokification of the internet.”

This is important for multiple reasons. One is the fact that TikTok surfaces content based on engagement-driven algorithmic curation rather than follower counts. As Madung put it: “For me, as someone creating a disinformation campaign, I don’t have to worry about building an audience. I can just focus on my content—make sure it’s able to hit the right notes—and TikTok will do the rest for me.”

Regulation—or the lack thereof—is another big factor. Madung, who lives in Kenya, said many in Africa are worried about “the ability of information operations from Russia to spread through different parts of the continent without having to work to do it.” Pointing to the chaos surrounding last year’s Kenyan presidential election, Madung claimed TikTok fails to enforce its own ban on political advertising and also allows hate speech to fly under the radar because moderating content in the region’s many languages is expensive and there are few laws forcing the company to act. This, he said, has led to the “normalization of bad behavior.”

Does it make a difference that Europe’s new Digital Services Act is forcing Big Tech to tackle disinformation? Madung said the DSA “could provide the right type of impact legislation that could end up bringing about waves of positive change within social media platforms”—but the companies may just choose to abide by such rules in rich countries while remaining lax in others. “We are beginning to see the internet itself is fracturing and becoming a different thing depending on the countries you go to.”

A TikTok spokesperson told Fortune that the company’s community guidelines apply everywhere in the world and that TikTok had removed 91 million pieces of unwanted content in the first quarter of this year, with 97% being automatically removed before it was reported.

“Providing our global community with creative and joyful experiences on TikTok starts with feeling safe, which is why we robustly and diligently enforce our rules against harmful misinformation and hateful behavior,” the spokesperson said. “To better serve the unique needs of different communities, we partner with local and international organizations, such as AfricaCheck.org, Article 19, and AFP, as we continue to strengthen our approach to safety.”

The OSRI is now developing tools that would allow TikTok users to tell Mozilla about what TikTok is putting on their For You pages. Mozilla researchers (including Becca Ricks, who now heads up OSRI) previously did something similar with YouTube, with a web extension that let volunteers opt into donating data about the videos recommended to them. If they can now create “a mobile version that allows us to obtain similar sources” from TikTok, Madung said, that should shed more light on the platform’s impact on democracy.

News below. And by the way, remember how yesterday I wrote about Microsoft and Activision’s good news on the merger front, including the U.K.’s Competition and Markets Authority deciding to consider the companies’ suggestions for restructuring the deal to get regulatory clearance? Well, now it turns out the CMA might reward such a restructuring with a whole new merger investigation. This could drag on for a while yet.

Want to send thoughts or suggestions to Data Sheet? Drop a line here.

David Meyer

NEWSWORTHY

Chinese tech losses. China’s regulatory crackdown on its tech sector has reduced the companies’ value by $1.1 trillion, according to Refinitiv data reported by Reuters. Prominent victims include Alibaba Group, Tencent, Baidu, Meituan, and JD.com. The two-year crackdown is also perceived as having held Chinese companies back from rolling out A.I. chatbots to the public, ultimately harming the sector’s competitiveness. However, with Chinese tech firms now toeing the line, Beijing seems to be warming to them again.

Illumina Grail fine. The European Commission has hit the genome-sequencing firm Illumina with a €432 million ($476 million) antitrust fine for going through with its takeover of blood-test outfit Grail while the Commission was still in the process of investigating it. The Commission is absolutely furious about Illumina’s intentional flouting of EU rules and levied the maximum allowable fine: 10% of its global revenue. Separately, the Commission green-lit Broadcom’s $61 billion acquisition of VMware, with some conditions.

TikTok buyback. TikTok operator ByteDance is preparing a share buyback for U.S. employees later this year, allowing them to vest shares without waiting for an IPO that’s not happening anytime soon given the political pressure on the company. The Information and Reuters report that TikTok’s 7,000-ish U.S. workers were getting antsy about the previous terms of their restricted stock grants. They will, however, have to pay tax on the share vesting.

SIGNIFICANT FIGURES

27%

—The percentage of jobs in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development—a club of 38 mostly richer countries—that could be automated with A.I. in the coming years. That’s according to the OECD itself, with Secretary-General Mathias Cormann observing: “How A.I. will ultimately impact workers in the workplace and whether the benefits will outweigh the risks, will depend on the policy actions we take.”

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT

Bing’s search chatbot is increasing click-throughs to websites rather than stealing traffic, says Microsoft VP, by Stephen Pastis

Meta exec says ‘the metaverse hype is dead’ and he’s happy: ‘Now we can put our heads down to build,’ by Kylie Robison

Adam Neumann says his new company, Flow, which raised $350 million from a16z, has only two choices: Compete with WeWork or partner with it, by Anne Sraders

Sam Altman just took a nuclear energy startup public for $500 million. Its CEO wants to provide ‘energy at planetary scales for a billion-plus years,’ by Paolo Confino

Al Gore describes the cleantech ‘wart’ on Biden’s historic Inflation Reduction Act, by Ellie Austin

Music streamers like Apple and Spotify should increase prices and capitalize on superfans to stem losses, says Goldman Sachs, by Eleanor Pringle

BEFORE YOU GO

Musk’s glass house. Tesla was (and might still be) planning to build a “dramatic glass-walled building” near the company’s Austin HQ, according to a Wall Street Journal report. Apparently, it was to be a house for CEO Elon Musk.

The Journal says the “Project 42” plan sparked an internal Tesla inquiry over the use of company resources, with board members getting involved. Personally, I hope the scheme goes ahead if only to stop Musk from throwing around so many insults on Twitter. After all, you know what they say about people who live in glass houses…